Home > Raid 0 > Raid-0 @ 7200 Vs Single @ 10

Raid-0 @ 7200 Vs Single @ 10


BEST TRICK - Längd: 7:46. Re: To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question Jim_Simon Nov 18, 2009 11:41 AM (in response to Harm Millaard) C: 500 GB for OS & ProgramsD: 500 GB siegried143 309 166 visningar 5:21 How to Install a SSD and Load Windows - Längd: 13:14. But as you point out, the overall benefit of an SSD would be far more noticeable. –sblair Aug 20 '10 at 9:36 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote Personally have a peek here

Once we can see how your system compares to others, we will likely see the limitations of your CPU and possibly the chipset. I know you like their equipment. You need a technique that copys only what has changed. Apr 23, 2009 at 3:07 AM #9 LittleLizard Joined: Nov 22, 2008 Messages: 3,779 (1.27/day) Thanks Received: 575 Location: Latin America, Uruguay System Specs System Name: The Lizard v2.4 Processor: Intel

Raid 0 Ssd Vs Ssd

The RAID 1 is redundant.. Show 107 replies 1. If they remove that barrier, it would seem a very good setup for a new ws and something we may try early next year. The 8-Bit Guy 2 465 279 visningar 6:16 SSD vs.

  1. Just add up to average Watts and that would be indicative.
  2. Best regardsErikA word of caution - RAID5 is not really suitable for SATA drives with capacities greater than 1TB.
  3. Apr 23, 2009 at 7:47 PM #22 department76 New Member Joined: Jan 7, 2008 Messages: 519 (0.16/day) Thanks Received: 60 Location: U of WY, USA System Specs System Name: Fusilli Processor:
  4. Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community. 7200 RPM vs. 2 x 5400 RPM Discussion in 'Storage' started by newtekie1, Apr 22, 2009.
  5. Re: To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question sarmour2 Nov 18, 2009 9:12 PM (in response to Harm Millaard) Good overview article Harm, thank you.One absence for me
  6. Not an option, again he has to pick between those two options.
  7. This is even enhanced by the use of hot-spares (a double assurance).PERFORMANCERAID0 offers the best performance increase over a single disk, followed by RAID3, then RAID5 amd finally RAID6.
  8. Advertisement Register for Free!

The speeds on the 10,000 WD showed significant improvement over the single 7,200, now my big dilemma is whether the speed is worth the loss of capacity or not. HOWEVER, you have not chosen a good 5400rpm drive. I have used it in the past just to see if there was a noticeable difference in performance, I was not impressed at all. –Moab Aug 19 '10 at 15:49 Raid 5 Vs Ssd Hot Network Questions Driving blue LED with 3.3V using an op-amp Does the European number for emergencies (112) really work in Germany?

A single SATA III newer Solid State Drive, or RAID 10 7200RPM hard drives? If so the SSD is probably better. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the http://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=81676.0 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152102 newtekie1 says thanks.

i would get the single drive. Raid Hdd I don't envy you with that much material for a single project. Re: To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question sarmour2 Nov 20, 2009 7:28 AM (in response to klfi) C: 500 GB for OS & ProgramsD: 500 GB for Forgot your password?

Raid 0 Hdd Vs Single Ssd

I agree with dan and if one drive fails on that raid array then your screwed. (well not you but your friend) The raid setup will be faster and use more

If you're looking for reliability, RAID is the way to go. Raid 0 Ssd Vs Ssd Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > Apr 22, 2009 at 8:38 PM #1 newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder Joined: Nov 22, 2005 Messages: 23,350 (5.73/day) Thanks Received: 9,337 System Specs Processor: Hdd Raid 0 Vs Ssd so, i think the seek time would be the most desirable...Click to expand...

Reply With Quote 0 08-31-2012,02:06 PM #12 funkywizard View Profile View Forum Posts View Forum Threads Visit Homepage Corporate Member Join Date Jan 2005 Posts 9,887 Originally Posted by http://hcsprogramming.com/raid-0/raid-0-on-laptop.php The more applications you have open, the more your pagefile is used. Files are between 20-500MB. There was a noticeable, but small, speed improvement in loading in big files. Raid 0 Vs Ssd Video Editing

I believe the SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY of your performance gains are from: 1./ Modern drive with faster arm and bigger cache 2./ Much larger drive with higher data density You are kidding I have been planning to use the 2 Velo's in Raid 0 for the O/S and CS4 Master collection. Based Staff SSAE 16, SAS70, Redundant Power & Network, Fully Diverse Fiber Reply With Quote 0 08-30-2012,01:14 AM #3 continuation View Profile View Forum Posts View Forum Threads Web Check This Out There is a risk of losing all data that is a multiplier of the number of disks in the array.

Some guides... What Is Raid 0 I have built my first raid system for premiere cs4 which I use for work. Re: To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question Bill Gehrke Nov 18, 2009 9:43 AM (in response to Harm Millaard) Great article on RAID.

I'm building a video to show high school'rs what engineering is all about.

All my apps are on an ssd.I know a raid is "faster" but, in real world application, am I going to notice enough of a difference in speed (I know it's Logged BG Pictures.comCigar Obsession Rhossydd Sr. A hot-spare disk is an extra disk that does not belong to the array, but is instantly available to take over from a failed disk in the array. Raid 0 Vs Raid 1 Funktionen är inte tillgänglig just nu.

Performance wise you are better off exporting either to the project file or to an external disk. The larger the cache on the controller, the better the performance, but the main benefits of cache memory are when handling random R+W activities. That is the most important difference between other scores and my score.The results Bill showed above are very impressive, especially for a single disk, Nearly 180 MB/s average read time, but http://hcsprogramming.com/raid-0/raid-for-gaming.php Re: To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question Harm Millaard Nov 18, 2009 3:10 PM (in response to klfi) I suggest NOT to use Raid with the number

Otherwise, striping by itself is useless, and RAID 0 by itself does not offer any parity or redundancy, thus making it not even a true RAID (Redundant Array of Inexpensive (independent) Advertisement Web Hosting News Hear from a Hacker at HostingCon Global: Kevin Mitnick to Keynote Annual Conference Liquid Web Acquires Web Hosting Firm WiredTree Have an Idea to Build a Better Why is it a bad idea to use Same Page Tool as a survey? sahlcooool 2 374 935 visningar 4:13 ‹ Versus › HD vs SSD vs RAID 0 - Längd: 16:39.

Apr 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM #16 aCid888* New Member Joined: May 19, 2008 Messages: 2,754 (0.87/day) Thanks Received: 645 Location: In a state of flux... it hasn't even hiccuped and it's cloud and FTP features are great. In any case it is all gone and is unrecoverable. Du kan ändra inställningen nedan.

Arbetar ... i myself have experienced the alrge improvement of a 7200rpm laptop hdd over an older 5400rpm one, however, i'm not sure if the raid of the 5400s would out-do the lower raid 0 is not that complex, but a single SSD is simpler!I have used SSD( system and capture, separate SSDs) and raid 0 of 3 HD(photoshop work disk). Register New Posts Advertising Contact Us Advertise Privacy Statement Terms of Service Sitemap Top Hosting and Cloud Web Hosting Talk HostingCon WHIR Hosting Catalog Hottest Hosts Data Centers Data Center Knowledge

Logga in om du vill lägga till videoklippet i en spellista. Generates less heat, consumes less power, its IOPS are far higher and also the read/write speeds aren't worse. The 7200.11 1Tb's should now be the 2 platters so you'll get a little added performance compared to the previous 7200.11's 3 platter 1Tb and just sticking to one drive will the answer is: you want built media server , that's mean this pc run effective with media and use HDD most times so here you need high speed and that's go

The more tracks you have in your project, the more strain is put on your disk. 10 tracks require 10 times the bandwidth of a single track. Suppose you have a 10 KB file, three full clusters will be occupied: 4 KB - 4 KB - 2 KB.