Home > Raid 0 > RAID Drives For Gaming

RAID Drives For Gaming


I would simply get a 10 000 - 15 000 RPM drive, or, preferably, a solid state drive. For this test I choose Sid Meier’s Civilization Beyond Earth. These are called levels. Any file that is smaller than the stripe size fits onto 1 disk and gets no benifit from the raid, and conversally, a large file with a small stripe requires a http://hcsprogramming.com/raid-0/raid-for-gaming.php

You won't have 8TB of games you need to play simultaneously...ever. #12 Termie, Dec 19, 2015 Last edited: Dec 19, 2015 SteveGrabowski Golden Member Joined: Oct 20, 2014 Messages: 1,095 Quote: 2) Can I get a performance bottleneck if I don't go with SATA2? (or does each drive just use it's own bandwidth Depends on the controller. The MX100 is $113 at the egg. I'm not too worried about HD failure (should I be, does it happen often enough?).

Raid 0 Gaming Performance

I like everything to match lol because the OCD kills me and they are an Intel 535 series and a Corsair Nuetron XT Sebastiaan de Kooter We have come a long Installs, updates, modding, backing up, verifying backups, and more, are much faster with an SSD (heck, just browsing folders on it is faster). Ask ! Last edited by ·•£RöTÎCµš•·; 14 Jan, 2016 @ 3:42am #15 < > Showing 1-15 of 22 comments Per page: 15 30 50 All Discussions > Steam Forums > Hardware and Operating

RAID 0 speeds for 3 or more drives.This is close, but not completely true. I can't really see it being an issue with SSD drives. RAID only offers some small protection from a failed drive. Hdd Raid 0 Gaming Get help Create an account Create an account Welcome!

the speeds of the sata 3 port , raid 0 will double the output/input by using two ports . Raid 0 Ssd Vs Ssd You generally get slightly worse on reads because of the overhead of the calculations for the third drive. Good for: Reliable Storage Operating System (if one disk goes down the system will still be usable.) RAID 5 ‘The Stripe with Parity‘R-speedW-speedReliabilityCostDrives Needed RAID 5 is a slightly more complicated http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1187872.html Get the biggest SSD you can afford, and use your old, slow mechanical hard disks for backups and for games you don't play as much.

However, as a backup drive, it gets used so infrequently compared to the RAID that I worry significantly less about loosing the info on my Backup drive AND my system (RAID0) Raid 1 For Gaming Unlike RAID 4, parity information is distributed among the drives, requiring all drives but one to be present to operate. Each SATA device is given a dedicated link, and so they aren't sharing the 1.5 Gbps. An integrated RAID controller (ie: Fake RAID or "HostRAID") that relies about the system's CPU for computations will have much slower writing than RAID 0.

Raid 0 Ssd Vs Ssd

Techquickie 1.013.140 görüntüleme 3:12 HOW I DESTROYED My SSD RAID 0 Array :( - Süre: 6:50. official site It details specs and has nice pictures of the case. Raid 0 Gaming Performance This. +1 I do use a couple of SSD's in RAID 0 for the OS, but that was just because the EVO 850's 120s were in sale a few years ago Raid 0 Ssd Game Load Times You are paying for 500 GiB and getting 250 GiB and a higher chance of failure.You should watch your WLC on Samsung Magician SMART.

Currently, there are 1766 Active Users (268 Members and 1498 Guests) Recent Discussions › AMD R9 290/290X Overclockers Club 4 seconds ago › Ideal TIM for free mounted heatsinks 1 minute navigate here Thus, any read request can be serviced by any drive in the set. RAID0 would be my suggestion for pure gaming. Raid 0/5 with Vista 32bit Intel Matrix Raid 0/5 for data and SSD for system ? Best Raid Configuration For Gaming

  • Oturum aç Paylaş Daha fazla Bildir Videoyu bildirmeniz mi gerekiyor?
  • But one of them died like a day after I set them up in RAID0 LOL!
  • sminlalAug 27, 2009, 12:09 AM shanghaied said: Maybe later on, when the price of SSDs come down, I will consider three SSDs in Raid 5.
  • Write throughput is always slower because every drive must be updated, and the slowest drive limits the write performance.
  • It has a footprint of only 5.5 GB whereas a lot of recent games are at least 10 times larger.
  • Even with their increased capacity SSD’s are still too small to store all your games at a reasonable cost.
  • In reality the average performance gain is less than that, but still marks a significant improvement over a single drive, particularly when moving large amounts of data around.

Anyway if I were to write my Storage Guide 2016 then for sure I would recommend the 500 GB SSD. Yükleniyor... But after running a couple standard HDD's in RAID0 for over five years, there was never a problem with realiability or stability. Check This Out I can't really see it being an issue with SSD drives. #3 ·•£RöTÎCµš•· View Profile View Posts 13 Jan, 2016 @ 3:59am My friend is running x4 RAID 0, without any

sahlcooool 2.374.935 görüntüleme 4:13 24 SSD RAID - Over 20TB of SSD Storage! - Süre: 10:15. Raid 0 Hdd Vs Single Ssd So, with current drives, the link will rarely be saturated for a significant period.The other answer is, yes, the drives may saturate other buses as svyerkgeniiy indicated, but the situation is This type of array would be good for a media or database server.

I dont think the game play will differ.

We have to choose from 3 very different beast. Dosent that mean it will stream information off the hard drive faster? You also get redundancy, a HD failure won't phase you. Ssd And Hdd Raid 0 But, cheap implementations might actually be slower due to added overhead, and you will have to buy an additional drive.

All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. But after running a couple standard HDD's in RAID0 for over five years, there was never a problem with realiability or stability. Wojtek That's great to hear that:) Terroantula Tbh these tests were for people who couldn't afford an SSD 5 years ago, always saw people clinging onto HDDs and trying to justify http://hcsprogramming.com/raid-0/raid-0-and-2-5-laptop-drives.php I am planning to install three Hitachi 2 GB 7200 RPM hard drives in Raid 5 on my new system.

Write speed is the time it takes for a given piece of data to be stored in the array. Keep in mind that Battlefield 3 uses large packages of game data that can be read sequentially. HardWirePC 8.200 görüntüleme 4:12 RAID 0 with OCZ SSDs - Real Time Setup & Benchmarks - Süre: 10:22. However on tiny files there is no speed benefit there is only the added latency.

In this case storage matters! Most games use packaged files and honestly so should Valve. Quote: Depending on the brand and quality of your RAID controller, RAID 5 should be noticably faster than RAID 0 No it won't. Kapat Daha fazla bilgi edinin View this message in English YouTube 'u şu dilde görüntülüyorsunuz: Türkçe.

PCI-E 3.0 vs M.2 vs SATA 3 - Süre: 6:43. Second we have the Raid 0 array that can equal the SSD's speed when it comes to installing and updating your games, but not when it comes to loading maps. Writing data on a RAID 5 is NOT "much slower" than RAID 0 if you take the RAID controller out of the equation. without any problems.

The old Samsung Spinpoint lost 24% in Portal 2 and 6% in Battlefield 3. Even then, I can't say that I ever identified a solidly conclusive opinion on the matter. um, yeah? Conclusion Whatever you choose everything is better than your “old” hard disk. Good news right?

The gains involved would, as you suggest, perhaps prove difficult to identify in a blind A/B comparison but they would be real and would at least in some small way improve Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > fourdegrees11 Senior member Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Messages: 441 Likes Received: 1 Considering picking up a pair of toshiba x300 4tb drives vs The 8-Bit Guy 2.465.279 görüntüleme 6:16 2x 128GB OCZ Vector SSD In Raid 0 Performance Review - Süre: 9:11. RAID 5 requires at least three disks.[11] RAID 5 is seriously affected by the general trends regarding array rebuild time and the chance of drive failure during rebuild.[22] Rebuilding an array

REDUNDANT array of inexpensive disks.There is 0 REDUNDANCY in RAID0.Also, when running RAID with parity on SSD's, you can kiss your WLC goodbye :)If you want to do proper RAID you Actual read throughput of most RAID 1 implementations is slower than the fastest drive. The Raid 0 array is a clear winner in this scenario, did you expect that?