Home > Why Is > Why Is My Core 2 Duo E6300 Cpu Running At 100c And My 667 Ram Running At 333mhz?

Why Is My Core 2 Duo E6300 Cpu Running At 100c And My 667 Ram Running At 333mhz?

Ogg: are you game to try it? 0gg17th May 2007, 20:34yeahh, with pleasure ! Setting the desired bitrate of the subsequent video jobs to 2045 kbit/s. Which one should I refer to in your list? Windows XP MCE Intel Pentium 4 Prescott @ 3.20 Ghz Nvidia GeForce G210, 512 Mb of VRAM 2 GB 1280*1024 Beta 1.6.6 100 FPS 100 FPS Game is very playable, with get redirected here

Using pretty fast dualcore chips, many users have been able to get highly reproducible result with it. The default setting is at 800FSB for E4300 & the board works fine at that setting. Wait a few hours until the paint dried out. and how did you get the stuff off?

You explained the mod procedure very thoroughly at anandtech & helped me to squeeze every penny out of this cheap combo. on another thought though you could Isolate the "high" pad with a non conductive paint. And the Big question....in the picture it looked like BSEL2 was isolated.....DOES THIS Need to be isolated or can it be left open. wam bam 33% oc Evilsizer02-05-07, 01:04 AMbetter start looking for cheap HP/dell's with E4300's to oc...

  • users like Gamers apart from those editors and graphic designers, and for gamers apparently have no tym for dusting their cpu regularly and side panels stuffs etc… even graphic designers r
  • some easy taping off of a lil trail...
  • Current bios version 0505.
  • DavidJa02-05-07, 11:16 AM^^ umm i see 75Mhz not 66Mhz? :confused: atlr02-05-07, 11:24 AMRight, I extrapolate AGP=66MHz with a FSB=266MHz from the Everest report.
  • It makes a HUGE difference when you are doing less intensive encoding tasks, like CCE, which can easily run 120+fps on a quad core system with a basic AviSynth script.
  • Sometimes crashes completely Windows Vista (2003 type) Intel core duo @ 1.75 Ghz Nvidia quadro - unknown version 1GB 1280 x 1024 Beta 1.8.1 2 - 15FPS 1 - 10FPS Not
  • Vcc can vary during operation.

But it would be pretty sweet if you could do this. It is running at around 63 degrees at the hottest, is this okay? Swap it in and booted to Windows. pluss i really dont need the processing power...

SHUD I PRESS F2 ON START UP TO ENTER IN TO BIOS TO CHECK. So, in the PCI-E-lockless world of C2D mATX motherboards, I wonder if there are any that will overclock as decently as this Gigabyte, without gagging on an E4300 advertising a 266MHz Help! http://newwikipost.org/topic/ubhrhacsfFybLhgRVRwPsQNxtWBXft1l/Will-this-PSU-be-enough-for-a-Core-2-duo-E6300.html i have noticed that the temps in coretemp for the e4300 are abnormally low compared to say TAT.

YMMV. Windows Classic theme was used. 10.6.7 2* 6 CORE Intel Xeon Westmere (12 Cores) @ 2.93 GHz (5.86 GHz) 1 ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB and 1 ATI Radeon HD 5770 soon. (but I'm also busy watching the Bears...) EDIT: Ok, here are the pics. (1) Desktop showing the fsb info. (2) failed attempt by connecting only BSEL 1 & 2, (3) but even 1% is worth pursuing...

when i start everquest the cpu fan begins to run at max speed and does so with only bout a minute of down time. http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Hardware_performance/Archive_1 my computer temperature is 29 celcius on idle. paint it let it dry and ur done. It'll be interesting if you do that same n=10 experiment and calculate your errors as well.

bob51102-23-07, 03:37 AMAnyone had any luck with getting a decent mATX motherboard (or at least as decent as C2D mATX motherboards get) to accept an E4300 with this mod? disco12302-22-07, 08:03 PMI feel more comfortable with below observation: "E4300 CPU's may report TAT temperatures offset by +15c and should be disregarded. " I think the real temp of my E4300 Surprisingly however, only two of these new processors are planned to be clocked higher ... Taking this into account in the bitrate calculation.

that would require using thin wires. That's quite possibly true, but I didn't actually want to run at 7x200; it was just a quick test to see if it was consistent with what I was seeing with Even on Fullscreen Windows 7 (32-bit) QuadCore AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 940, 3000 MHz (15 x 200) ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series (1 GB) 4 GB (DDR2) 1280x1024 Alpha graysky6th April 2007, 21:21updated the table tsp6th April 2007, 23:27Is the inefficient scaling a function of an inefficient OS?

doh000002-04-07, 09:12 PMFinally a Success!!! I will be very interested in seeing someone w/ one of these new chips run the MeGUI test... This can skew the results.

Benchmarks indicate that cpuz and others such as tat are accurate.

the fan seems to work fine, the heatsink is unscarred and effective. any suggestions? Windows XP SP3 2.80GHz Intel Pentium (Single Core) NVidia GeForce FX 5500 2 GB DDR1 1280 x 1024 Beta 1.4_01 10-20 FPS 5-10 FPS Works really well on minimum graphics settings disco12302-22-07, 05:17 PMThis is my TAT values, is it OK?

on another thought though you could Isolate the "high" pad with a non conductive paint. View answers Core 2 E4300 vs. Windows 7 Ultimate Edition(64-bit) Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 DUO E7400 @ 4.02GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 OC`ed by me 4 GB 1920x1200 Beta 1.5_01 320-680 fps 350-400 fps Runs very fast and bryan_d02-25-07, 10:20 PMI just tried it and i have different problem.

Windows 7 Ultimate i7 2600k gtx 560 ti EVGA DS 4gb patriot 1600mhz lat.9 1600x1200 Beta 1.8.1 250 350 Plays very smooth 64 bit windows 7 core 2 duo 2.8 GHZ Frys changed to deal from OEM to retail on sunday. However, CPU-Z does confirm its running at 266MHz Alright thanks for clearing that up. What could be wrong?

But now the new penryn 45 nm core is on the horizon, so I'm thinking of waiting for that (133 MHz bus, 6 MB cache per core + SSE4 extensions) graysky15th nd4spdbh202-03-07, 07:28 PMisnt at least one of the other BSEL pins grounded considering there is at least one at Low? Insulate BSEL1 which is the red pin (very small piece of scotch tape will work). and it does look like you could either connect the BSEL2 or 0 to BSEL1 or just connect them all.

recommended GPU performance allowing*) Mac OS X 10.5.8 2x IBM PowerPC G5 @ 2.0 GHz Nvidia GeForce 7800 GS (AGP 8x) 5.5 GB DDR SDRAM 1680x1050 Beta 1.5_01 15-22 fps 14-20 I guess that would mean the PCI/AGP lock was not working? I guess I should READ the post. http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=124557 I haven't read that thread in awhile but I think there was a few test builds that made the 1st pass for the 8 core system more on par with

it could be something in the make up of the silver pen that adds to much resistance when tring to conduct electical signals. Ubuntu Linux 10.10 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz Geforce 7800 GTX (driver version: 195.36.24) 2GB 1920x1080 Beta 1.5_01 30-60 fps 20-50 fps Very well playable. but going from 82.55 fps with 35 % cpu utilization to 142.59 fps with >95 % cpu utilization is not perfect scaling(should be more like 225 fps) for 1st pass I Just because the FSB is faster doesn't mean the chip will be faster.

CPU-Z will show the FSB. If anyone knows how to get a Via P4M800 (pro)? (ce)? but every time i do it (today was the 4th time) the average load temperature goes up. There must have been some minor change in electrical specfications going from 90nm to 65nm that affected this but that stuff would be well beyond my understanding of the subject.

Preprocessing finished! im converting the video into a YUV 4:2:0 raw video to pipe directly to x264...god help us all morph16695510th April 2007, 02:23ok so heres the results using freebsd, x264 r647 and If you are running a socket 775 cpu go for the freezer pro 7. It was mentioned above that using a conductive silver pen would not work.